Upload
Send us your manuscript
Literature scan
Find the relevant prior work
Reviewer perspectives
Several expert viewpoints
Structured report
Specific, grounded feedback
Ready to submit
Know where you stand
See real reports
Every finding points back to a specific passage in the manuscript. This is the depth and structure of what you get, and exactly where each note lands.
Peer review is under strain
Submissions keep climbing, reviewers are stretched thin, and more papers now lean on generative tools. The work of catching what is wrong with a paper still falls on people who are short on time.
Papers published annually
Scientific output doubles every 9 years
Average review time
Per paper, per reviewer
Desk rejection rate
At top-tier venues
AI-assisted submissions
And growing rapidly
Find the problems before a reviewer does
Know how your paper reads to a referee while you can still fix it. The weak spots, the citations you missed, and how your contribution holds up.
The methodology is sound but needs more ablation studies to validate design choices.
Novel approach with strong experimental results. Minor concerns about scalability.
Theoretical justification is lacking. Consider adding formal analysis.
Get your poster reviewed before you present
Upload your conference poster and get a structured review in minutes. ReviewerLens reads the poster the way an attendee will, as an image, and checks both the science and how well the poster communicates it: legibility at viewing distance, visual hierarchy, figure design, and whether your headline claims actually hold.
Where the poster stands
What to fix first
- Poster legibility: dense Methods text, unlabeled result figure
- Hotspot claim is not supported by the evidence shown
- Add a one-line plain-language takeaway banner across the top so a passer-by gets the result in five seconds.
- Label every axis with units and add error bars or a confidence band (and the contributing sensor count) to the daily-mean time series.
Visual communication
Is the poster readable from two meters back? We flag dense text, small fonts, and a weak hierarchy that buries your result before anyone reaches it.
Figure and chart design
Unlabeled axes, missing units, no takeaway line. We catch the figure problems that lose a passer-by at a glance.
The science still holds
Beyond design, the same multi-reviewer panel checks your methods, claims, and evidence, so the poster stands up when someone asks the hard question.
No special format
Vision-based review reads any poster PDF directly, the way an attendee sees it. No template, no conversion, no slide export. Upload and get the report.
Same reviewer panel, tuned for posters
You get the same multi-reviewer report you would for a manuscript, with the paper-only sections swapped for poster-specific design feedback. See the live poster example above, then run your own.
Deeply discounted reviews for your whole program
We offer packages of monthly reviews, or buy them as needed at large discounts, to support education programs. Pricing is per seat. Reach out and we will tailor a discounted plan to your lab, department, or course.
Proof of lab or education status is required to qualify for the discounted pricing.
Monthly review packages
A recurring allotment of reviews shared across your students and staff, billed per seat. Predictable capacity for a cohort, a course, or a whole department through the term.
- A fixed pool of reviews every month
- Seats shared across the program
- Best for ongoing teaching and supervision
Reviews as needed
Buy review capacity in bulk and draw it down when you need it, with large discounts that grow with volume. Ideal for a thesis push, a grant deadline, or a one-off course.
- Pay once, use across the year
- Volume discounts at scale
- No monthly commitment
Built to support education
Discounted pricing for labs, departments, and teaching programs, so students get reviewer-grade feedback before they submit.
Cost per seat
Pricing scales with how many students and researchers need access. Reach out and we will quote a per-seat rate for your program.
One shared workspace
Everyone in the lab or department works from the same pool of review capacity, with the same grounded, deterministic analysis.
Reach out for a per-seat quote
Tell us about your program, how many students and researchers need access, and how you expect to use reviews. We will put together a monthly package or a discounted bulk plan priced per seat, built around your department. Proof of lab or education status is required to qualify for the discounted rate.
More submissions, same standard
Take formatting checks, triage, and quality control off your reviewers' plates as volume grows. Every submission lands baseline-confirmed and reviewer-ready. The decision is still yours.
2,847
342
1,205
23
Scaling Laws for Neural Machine Translation
Self-Supervised Learning for Medical Imaging
Efficient Transformers for Long Sequences
Graph Neural Networks for Drug Discovery
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
Formatting checks
Confirm every submission meets the venue's baseline before a human opens it: template, page and length limits, anonymization, required sections, and references.
Triage
Sort and prioritize submissions by topic, quality signals, and reviewer availability, so the queue arrives ordered.
Risk flags
Catch the likely problems early: citation gaps, methodological concerns, and integrity flags worth a closer look.
Reviewer-ready, not auto-decided
The system confirms a submission passes baseline and prepares it for review. It never accepts or rejects. The decision stays with your reviewers.
Checked by the system, decided by your reviewers
ReviewerLens does not accept or reject anything. It confirms each submission passes baseline, covering formatting, integrity, and quality checks, so it reaches a reviewer's desk ready to read. The decision is always theirs.
Tailored review for your conference or journal
This is not a thin wrapper around a chatbot. ReviewerLens runs a deterministic analysis pipeline that is reproducible across runs, grounded in sources you can verify, and tuned to your venue's criteria. Whether you run a conference, a journal, or a program with its own house rules, we build the pipeline around your use case: your submission format and templates, your compliance and anonymization gates, your scoring rubrics, and the reviewer workflows that fit how your committee actually decides. We work directly with program chairs and editorial boards to fit it to the way you already run review. Contact us for pricing built around your submission volume.
Why not just paste it into a chatbot?
Because peer review needs grounding a general chatbot does not have: real citations, consistent scoring, and a human at the end.
ReviewerLensGrounded citations
Points to real papers you can verify
Structured evaluation
The same criteria and scoring every time
Reviewer perspectives
Several reviewer angles, not one voice
Conference workflows
Triage, assignment, and tracking
Reproducible analysis
Same paper in, same results out
Fast turnaround
A full report in minutes, not weeks
Domain awareness
Tuned to your field, not generic
Human oversight
A person makes the final call
Grounded citations
Points to real papers you can verify
Structured evaluation
The same criteria and scoring every time
Reviewer perspectives
Several reviewer angles, not one voice
Conference workflows
Triage, assignment, and tracking
Reproducible analysis
Same paper in, same results out
Fast turnaround
A full report in minutes, not weeks
Domain awareness
Tuned to your field, not generic
Human oversight
A person makes the final call
Where we're headed
We started with researchers vetting their own work. We're extending the same checks to the people who review everyone else's.
For researchers
Catch the weak spots in your paper before a reviewer does.
For conferences
Keep up with rising submission volume without lowering the bar.
For journals
Quality checks and editorial workflow that fit how you already work.
Research integrity
Spotting fabrication, citation gaps, and integrity problems at scale.
Pay per review
No subscription required. Buy reviews when you need them. They never expire, and every one is a complete referee report, ready in seconds.
A professional pre-submission edit costs $200+ and takes weeks.
Single
One complete referee report
1 complete review
- Three specialist reviewers: methodology, novelty & clarity
- Area-chair consensus and verdict
- Novelty score vs. prior work
- Citation suggestions from real papers
- Reference, figure & readability checks
- Where to submit, ranked by fit
- Private or zero-retention, your choice
Bundle
Review, revise, review again
3 complete reviews
- Three specialist reviewers: methodology, novelty & clarity
- Area-chair consensus and verdict
- Novelty score vs. prior work
- Citation suggestions from real papers
- Reference, figure & readability checks
- Where to submit, ranked by fit
- Private or zero-retention, your choice
Value pack
Cover your whole submission cycle
6 complete reviews
- Three specialist reviewers: methodology, novelty & clarity
- Area-chair consensus and verdict
- Novelty score vs. prior work
- Citation suggestions from real papers
- Reference, figure & readability checks
- Where to submit, ranked by fit
- Private or zero-retention, your choice
Every pack is the same full report, but larger and subscription packs cost less per review. Reviewing for a department, lab, course, or journal? Talk to us.